女生小说尽在必读小说网!必读小说网手机版

小说首页 > 灵异悬疑 > 西雅图夜未眠 >法院文件-反驳他出庭前的恶毒诡辩36(2 / 2)
  • 手机阅读本书

法院文件-反驳他出庭前的恶毒诡辩36(2 / 2)

15)MAY14,called16times,sent6messages,andsent4emailstobothhispersonalandworkingemailaddressthatday.(SeeExhibit40)

16)MAY15,called24times,sent42messages,andsent2emailstobothhispersonalandworkingemailaddressthatday.Shewantedfinancialcompensation,askinghimtoanswerhercallsandmessages.(SeeExhibit40)

17)MAY15,sheemailedandmessaged(toolsimilartoZoom--Chime)atleast10ofhismanagersandcoworkers.Sheissayingthatheisasexualfraud.Shetellsthem:youaresexualfraud,yourbehaviorsharmedherandAmazon,shewantsanapology,shewantslossmadeup.SeetheemailinExhibit8(page13)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page2point6,10

2)Ionlysent1emailto5receipts,pluspetitionerhimself,withethesamerequestason04/27/2023,fearingthatKangDaimayfurtherdefamemyreputation,andduetohisthreatsonApril24,2023andthoseonlinedefamationwhichcausedmyseverefear,IbelievedthatKangDai’semployerasneutralthirdparty,shouldhavetheauthoritytomakeaninternalinvestigationandrevealthetruth.Becausehesaidhiscolleaguesallknewalready,andhissupervisorsareChinese,andinChineseculture,mangerandemployeecanmanagesuchtopicprivatelyandpeacefully.IdidnotreporthimtothepoliceasIwashopingtoresolvetheproblemsprivatelyandpeacefullywithKangDai.AmazonHRandhissurpervisorrepliedandpromisedwilltakecareofit.(SeeExhibit45,31)

3)Ididn’tsay“youaresexualfraud”-didn’tfindthisinemail

4)“yourbehaviorsharmedher”-yes,hisbehaviorharmedme,hehurtsmedeeplyemotionallyduetohisdeceptionandmanipulationinthepast7years.Hehurtsmedeeplyphysicallyduetohehadsexwithmeinmyperiodon02/10/2023,whichcausedmephysicalpainlastedtillnow.Hisbehaviorscausedmemaynottohavechildanymore

18)MAY16,

a.Shecalled2times,sent6messages

b.ShecreatedaChimechattingroom,namedisas“DaiKang-SexualFraud”,invitedhismanagersintotheroo

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17”

2)Iwonderedwhyhedidn’treplymeafterreadmymessage,IalsowonderedifthatishisChimeaccount.Soon05/16/2023,Iinvitedachatroomwithname“DK”.Buthestayedinthechatroom.Isent1message:“DaiKang,pleasedon’tavoidtheproblem.”On05/17/2023,Iadded“hismanagers”tothechatroom.Hestilldidn’tleavethechatroom,oraskmenottodoso.Isent3messagesinchatroom.Thechatroomnameisstill“DK”.On05/18/2023,Isentafewmessages.Thenameofthechatroomwasstill“DK”.Idon’trememberfromwhatexacttimeIchangednameto“DaiKang-SexualFraud”forafewminutes.IntotalIsent10messageswith2screenshots.AfterIreceivedandunderstoodtheprotectionorder.Iremovedeveryonefromthechatroom,anddidn’tcontacthimagain.(SeeExhibit40,47,31)

3)Hismangerreplied.(SeeExhibit47lastscreenshot)

c.Attemptedtoconnecttohisworkemailaddress,sentspamcallstothecompany'sChimeaccount,andattemptedtodisrupthiswork

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17

2)He“offwork2months”-howtodisrupthiswork?

19)MAY16,shethreatenedhimonhersocialmedia,stating,“Ineedcompensation”,“Ifyoudon'tanswermeorcometoseeme,Iwilltryallmeanstofindpeoplewhomightknowyou.“

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page1point5,d

2)Two“May16”,canorganizeintoone

3)Noevidenceof“threaten”,nointentionof“threaten”,thisisdefamation.Seehowpetitionerthreatenedme(SeeExhibit31)

4)Ididn’tsay“ifyoudon’tcometoseeme”,Ididn’tsay“Iwilltryallmeans”.ThisiscompletewrongandmisleadingtranslationfromChinesetoEnglish

5)“Ineedcompensation”,becausePetitionerpromisedmeon04/24/2023,thatI“couldbringanydemandtohim”duetohis7yearsliesandhurtingtome.(SeeExhibit31)

20)MAY17,

a.Called2times,sent18messages

b.Sent10messagesinChimechattingroom.Saidsamestuffasemailsandabusedhi

ResponsefromRespondent:

Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17

21)May18,called4times,sent22messages.Seeallthecalls&messagemotionedaboveinExhibit9(page14)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17

2)SeeExhibit40forcomprehensivestatistics

22)May18,theAnti-harassmentProtectionOrderwasdeliveredtoher

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)OnMay18,2023,intheafternoon,Ireceivedatextmessagefromapoliceofficer,mentioningacivilprotectionorderbutdidnotincludeanycontentoftheorder.Atthattime,Ididnotknowthemeaningofaprotectionorder.Irepliedpoliceat5:09PMpoliceaboutthenatureofprotectionorder

2)Andafterspendingwholeeveningonit,Istilldidn’tfullyunderstandit,duetomylimitedexperienceinAmerica,noneexperienceoflaw,andlanguagebarrier.Policerepliedmenextdaybutwithoutansweringmyquestionsabouttheorder.(SeeExhibit48,49)

3)Therefore,nextdayonMay19,2023,IcalledpolicetocometomyhometohelpmeunderstandwhatisprotectionorderandwhatIshoulddo.Iinvitedpolicetocheckmyphoneandlaptop.TwopoliceofficersconfirmedthatIdidn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)

4)Afterthat,Ididn’tcontactpetitioneranymore,asIalsodidn’twanttocontact

23)May18,shestartedtoVIOLATEtheorderanddisregardthecourtdocumentsinseveralways

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Ididn’tviolatetheorder.OnMay19,2023,IcalledpolicetocometomyhometohelpmeunderstandwhatisprotectionorderandwhatIshoulddo.Iinvitedpolicetocheckmyphoneandlaptop.TwopoliceofficersconfirmedthatIdidn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)

RefutingPage5Line20:

24)Respondentadmittedtocreatingaposttitled“Moveon“andclaimingtostop.However,itisimportanttonotethattheRespondentincludedaGoogleDrivelinkinthatpost,whichwasusedtoexposethePetitioner'sprivateaudiorecordings.ThisactionclearlydemonstratesthattheRespondentdidnotactuallymoveonbutinsteadstartedtheharassment

SeeExhibit10(page43)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Herethestatementand“Exhibit10(page43)aretotallydifferentstuff.Evidencedoesn’tsupportstatementatall

2)StatementRepeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedinpage1,6),a;inpage2,13),pleaserefertopreviousresponse

3)On04/24/2023,afterIwasinformedthatpetitionerliedtome“frombeginningtoend”inthepast7years,afterhethreatenedmeinvariousways,afterheusedmeagain,afterhepromisedto“continuouslyapologizetomeandlistentomydemands”,afterhechosenottofullfillhispromisetomyeitherdemand“calltoapologize”or“compensation”,from04/24/2023to05/01/2023,itindeedtookmesuchaLONGtimetoMOVEON,andIstillfailedtoMOVEON!IsowishedthatImovedonwithinONEDAYon04/24/2023!

4)Isowanttomoveon,butpetitionerdraggedmetolegalmatters,noletmemoveon!

5)Whydon’tpetitionermoveon?

6)Anyonecanhelpmemoveonquickly?IevenprayedforGodtohelpmemoveonon04/24/2023.(SeeExhibit51)

7)“startedharassment”-nottrue

8)On04/24/2023,afterPetitionercalledme,Ididn’trecordthecallinthebeginning.Afterhethreatenedmewithhisdeathataround3AM,whichmademeveryscared.Unknowninternetusersremindedmetorecordthecallasevidencetoprotectmyself.SoIrecordedtoprotectmyself.Hiscallwasfullofblames,threats,leis,beggingandmanipulation.Atthattime,Ididn’tknowthatIneedhisauthorizationtorecord,Iwastooscaredandexhaustedandjustwantedtoprotectmyself.Onewhohearsthecallwillknowhowhedeceivedme,blamedme,threatenedmeandmanipulatedme,willunderstandtheentirematter.However,untilIhiredattorney,IlearnedthatIneedopposingparty’sauthoritytorecordthecallinWA.Atthattime,Ijustwantedtoprotectmyself.Ineverexperiencedthisinmylife

9)Thecall/conversation/voiceisnotprivate,becausewhenhecalledme,hewasinahospital-apublicplace,andtherewerethirdpartiesspeaking,forexample,hiswifespokewithmeandhelpedhimlie,therewaspass-by’svoicesandhornsound

10)Anyonewhoseethispostisnotabletolistentoit,asit’sjustagooglelink,averylongandcomplicatedlink.Theconversationissavedinprivategooglelink

11)Thepurposeofthelinkistodefendmyselffromcountlessdisgustingdefamationonme,asunknowninternetuserssuggestedthosedefamationfromPetitioner,Petitioner’swifeortheirfriends.(SeeExhibit25,26)

12)Itoldpetitioneraboutthedefamation,butheignoredit

13)ToprotectPetitioner’sprivacy,Iremovedthepartthatincludes/coulddisclosePetitioner’spersonalinformationincludinghisname.Therefore,it’sonlyabout1.5hours,not3or4hoursashecalledme.(Petitionertooksexualphotoofmewithoutmyknowledgeandconsent!)

14)Thelinkdoesn’tworkwell.Anotherlinkisblank.(SeeExhibit27)

15)Thegooglelinkofourconversationworkedataroundnoontimeon05/01/2023,afewhourslater,Isetthepermissiontoprivate,sonoonecanlistentoit,asIwantedtomoveon.Ialsodeleteditlater.(SeeExhibit2

Page4

RefutingPage9Line4:

25)Respondentliedaboutherviolationoftheprotectionorder.Shesaidbeforeshewasserved,shemadeapostexpressingherconfusion,shock,andpain.However,inherposts,shewasquestioningwhyPetitionerstartedtheprotectionorderagainsther,whichmeanssheobviouslygottheprotectionorderbeforethepost’stimestampbutstillviolatedthem5times

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedinpage3,23)

2)Ididn’tviolateorder.(SeeExhibit48,49,51)

3)Ididn’tlie.Ididn’tsay“Shesaidbeforeshewasserved,shemadeapost“,thisisthisreader’sintentionalwrongunderstandingbypickingpartoftheoriginalcontent,justlikehowreflectedinotheraccusationsand“evidence”.Inthefileof“response”,originalwordsare“AfterBeingServedoftheTemporaryProtectionOrder,sheHas

NeverKnowinglyorWillfullyViolatedtheOrder.”“allofherattemptstocontactPetitionerweremadebeforeshewasservedoftheorderandknewofthecontentandmeaningoftheorder.”

a.ContactinghimviaWeChatmessage

(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)

b.ContactinghimviaChimemessage

(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)

c.Contactingthethird-parties(MrDai’smanagers)thatmightknowhim

(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)

d.PostingtheOrderandcourtdocumentsonhersocialmedia(LittleRedBook,thenencouragingpeopletoengageinnewinternetviolenceanddoxingagainstMr.Dai

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Noevidenceof“encouragingpeopletoengageinnewinternetviolenceanddoxingagainstMr.Dai”,alreadyrepeatedintheparagraphabove.Noevidenceforthis.Pleaserefertothecontentofmypost.(SeeyourownevidenceormyExhibit53.)

2)Postdoesnotincludehispersonalinformation.Instead,Ievenmarkedhisinformationtoprotecthisprivacy

3)ThepostwasbeforeIfullyunderstoodwhatisprotectionorder

4)Thedocumentispublicdocument

5)IfullyrespectedtocourtasIattendedhearingonsiteeverytime,whilepetitionerandpetitioner’sattorneyattendedonlineeverytimeanddoesn’twanttoshowfacetojudge

e.Creatingaposton,askinghimwhyheappliedforaprotectionorderagainsther

SeeExhibit11(page50)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Herethestatementand“Exhibit11(page50)aretotallydifferentstuff.Evidencedoesn’tsupportstatementatall

2)Abouttheposton.Ididn’tmeanto“askhim”,Imeanttoaskmyself,askGod,duetoeverythingIsufferedfromhim.Seecontent.(SeeExhibit54)

3)Thepostdidn’tincludehispersonalinformation

4)ThepostwasbeforeIfullyunderstoodwhatisprotectionorder

5)Onthesameday,atnight,Irequestedthewebsitetodeletemypost,butnotabletodoitduetowebsitepolice-“postwillnotdeleteifthepostdoesn’tcontainpersonalinformation”.Ievenreportedmyownpost,andaskedpeopletohelpmereportmypost,soitcanbeclosed.(SeeExhibit55)

RefutingPage12Line23:

26)Respondentliedaboutherposts.ShesaidshedidnotmentionanynameorprovideanyPetitioner’spersonalinformationnorengageinternetviolenceagainstPetitioner.However,thefactis:

a.ShepostedtwogoogledrivelinksandtwobaidudrivelinkswiththePetitionerprivateinformationincludingthenameinitialsandvoicerecord,resultedin38,480viewsand77comments.SeeExhibit12(page51)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatedagainasrepeatedinpage2,13),a,b;inpage3,24)

2)Thelinkdoesn’tincludehisnameorpersonalinformation.Evidencedoesn’tsupport

3)Noevidenceof“engageinternetviolenceagainstPetitioner”.Thisisdefamationonme

4)Thepurposeofthelinkistodefendmyselffromcountlessdisgustingdefamationonme,asunknowninternetuserssuggestedthosedefamationfromPetitioner,Petitioner’swifeortheirfriends.(SeeExhibit25,26)

5)ToprotectPetitioner’sprivacy,Iremovedthepartthatincludes/coulddisclosePetitioner’spersonalinformationincludinghisname.Therefore,it’sonlyabout1.5hours,not3or4hoursashecalledme.(Petitionertooksexualphotoofmewithoutmyknowledgeandconsent!)

6)Thecall/conversation/voiceisnotprivate,becausewhenhecalledme,hewasinahospital,andtherewerethirdpartiesspeaking,forexample,hiswifespokewithmeandhelpedhimlie,therewaspass-by’svoicesandhornsound

7)Thegooglelinkdoesn’tworkwell.Anotherlinkisblank.(SeeExhibit27)

8)Thegooglelinkofourconversationwaspublishedataroundnoontimeon05/01/2023,afewhourslater,Isetthepermissiontoprivate,sonoonecanlistentoit,asIwantedtomoveon.Ialsodeleteditlater.(SeeExhibit2

9)Twobaidulinksareblank,andcouldnotopen.(SeeExhibit56)

10)Therefore,“resultedin”isnottrue

RefutingPage13Line1:

27)Respondentliedaboutherlivestreamingactions.Shedeniesthesebehaviorsandsaidthereisnoevidenceprovethecontentoflivestreamnorcouldproveitevertookplace.Thefactisthat:

a.Thelivestreamlastedfor1hours45minutes

b.Latershealsouploadedtherecordofthelivestreamtohersocialmedia.Mr.Daihavethefullrecordofthelivestream.SeeExhibit13(page52)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Samepoint,repeated6times

2)Ididn’ttrytolivestream.IjusttriedtouseHimalayatoconvertvoiceintotext,asHimalayaistheonlytoolIknowthatcouldconvertvoiceintotext.Whiletryingthisfunction,itwasautomaticallyuploaded/“published”beforelunchtimeon05/18/2023,whileIdidn’tknow.YoucancheckwithHimalayaaboutthisfunction.AfterIsawit“published”,Iimmediatelydeletedit.IdeletedbeforeIreceivedtheprotectionorder.Ihavenopost/contentonHimalaya.(SeeExhibit57)

3)Ireturnedtherecordingtopetitioneralready

4)Petitioner’sevidenceshowedthathealsorecordedmyvoicewithoutmyauthorization

Page5

RefutingPage13Line1:

28)Respondentsaidthereisnoevidenceforhateorthreat.However,seebelowevidence:

a.InWeChat,shesaid12times“Ihateyou”

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Pleaserefertoentireconversationon04/24/2023,especiallypetitioner’sdeaththreats.(SeeExhibit31)

2)On03/22/2023,duetoIsuggestedbreakup,andduetootherarguments,Petitionersaid“Ihateyou”tome.Ialsosaiditback.Afterthat,petitionerstilldiscussedhowtoimproveourrelationship.On03/26/2023,hesaid“Itriedallmeanstorecoverourrelationship,andyoupushedmeawayagainandagain.”On03/28/2023,hesaid“Iwokeupthismorningthinkinghowtoimproverelationshipwithyou”Sopleaseaskpetitionerwhat“Ihateyou”meanstohim.(SeeExhibit5

b.Forthethreat,shesaid

i.“IwillgettothemajorforumsandplatformstoexposeyournamedirectlyifIwant”

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Whereistheevidence?

2)Ididn’tsayit

3)Showthecompletecontent.TranslatecorrectlyfromChinesetoEnglish

ii.“Ifyoudon'tanswermeorcometoseeme,Iwilltryallmeanstofindpeoplewhomightknowyou“

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Repeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedin5)d,19)

2)Ididn’tsay“ifyoudon’tcometoseeme”or“tryallmeans”,thisisintentionalwrongtranslationfromChinesetoEnglishtomislead

c.“Yoursubscriberswillbeinterestedinyourprivacy.”SeeExhibit14(page53)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)“Exhibit14onpage53doesn’treflectstatementatall

2)IassumeyoumeanthelastscreenshotonyourExhibit3,ifso,thetranslationofChinesemeans”Ppleasesolvetheproblemwell,yourfollowerscametocontactmeandaskaboutyourpersonallife.”(andIdidn’treplytotheirquestion.)

RefutingPage14Line1:

a.Respondentsaidshepostedherlovestoryonlyonce,however,shepostedmorethan30timestitledwithlovestory1–26,withatleasttwoseparateaccounts.SeeExhibit15(page54)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)“once”meansonecontinuoustime,asLittleRedBookdoesn’tallowmetopostalltextinonepost,soIhadtopostinmultipletimes.Ihad25postswithcontent.Post26hasnocontent.Pleasestopintentionalmisunderstanding

2)Becausemyfirstaccountwasfrozen,soIhadtousesecondaccount

3)It’smyfreedomtousemysocialmediaaccountstowritemystory,andit’sanonymousstory,withgoodintentiontoprotectparties’privacy

RefutingPage17Line14:

29)RespondentdeniedherStalkingorCyberstalkingPetitioner.SeetheExhibit3(page9)

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Exhibit3onpage9doesn’tshowthatI“stalk”or“cyberstalking”petitioner

2)Petitionercyberstalkedmewithsecretaccountsonsocialmedia.(SeeExhibit59)

3)Petitionersenthisfollowerstocyberstalkme

4)Petitionersenthisfollowerstocyberstalkme

5)Petitionerusedtosendmehundredsofmessagesaday.Petitionersentmeover700messagesonSkypeandWeChatonJanuary3,2023;about200mesagesonMarch22,2023;over1300messagesinthreedaysfromMarch26toMarch28,2023

RefutingPage19Line20:

30)Respondentthinkthereisnoneedtoissueafullordergiveshehavepostedtitled“Moveon”onMay1,2023.However,shestilldidn’tstoptheharassmentactionsandescalateditafterMay14,sheevenviolatedthetemporaryprotectionorder5times.So,theFullOrderisstillrequiredtoprotectthepetitionerandhisfamily

ResponsefromRespondent:

1)Excuseme,youwanttodecideformewhenIcanmoveon?Doyoupaymymedicalandtherapycosttohelpmemoveon?Haveyoubeendeceivedandmanipulatedandhurtfor7years?Haveyoubeenthreatenedwithdeath?Haveyousufferedseveredepression,anxietyandPTSD?Duetopetitioner’sbehaviors,Imaynotbeabletohavechildanymore!

2)Ashereyouagreedthatmyposton05/01/2023isabout“MoveOn”,whyyouquestionmenotmoveon?Whatisthelogic?

3)“Post”,“May14”,“order”,Repeatthesamepointsagainandagain

4)“harassment”isdefamationonme

5)Ididn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)

6)On05/01/2023,policetoldpetitionerthatmyposthasnothreats.On05/15/2023,policetoldpetitionerhecanblockmyphone.However,hemanipulatedme,police,courtandjudgeforhispurposeofprivaterevenge

7)DuetoallevidenceIprovided,afullDomesticViolenceandanti-harassmentOrderisrequiredtoprotectme

小提示:按 回车[Enter]键 返回章节目录,按 ←键 返回上一页, 按 →键 进入下一页。
查看目录